Welcome to Cutting Edge. Guests can see and read the contents of most of the boards on this forum but need to become members to read all of them. Currently membership is instant, but new accounts may be deleted if not activated within fourteen days.

If you decide to join the forum, please open your welcome message for further details. New members are requested to introduce themselves on the appropriate thread on our welcome board.

Members may post messages and start threads, but it is essential that they read our posting rules and advice before doing so. If you have any immediate questions or queries, please post them on the suggestions board.

After posting at least ten messages, members are able to contact each other and the staff through our personal messaging system.

This forum is administrated by Ivan and moonbeam and moderated by boatlady and astradt1.

Thank you for visiting Cutting Edge.

Media treatment of terrorist attacks

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Media treatment of terrorist attacks

Post by sassy on Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:04 pm

Terrifying to be going about your normal business and finding yourself in the middle of a war zone, contemptible to target civilians.

That being said, something has just been reported in The Independent that I find extremely puzzling

Brussels Metro attack: Video claiming to be CCTV of explosion was filmed in 2011
The footage was in fact from an attack on the Belarus capital Minsk in 2011
The footage that perports to be from Brussel airport, also turns out to be from Moscow Airport in 2011

Video showing the four sets of cctv on link

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/brussels-metro-attack-video-cctv-explosion-minsk-2011-a6947801.html


Now why on earth would they do that?
avatar
sassy

Posts : 28
Join date : 2016-03-19
Age : 71
Location : Suffolk

Back to top Go down

Re: Media treatment of terrorist attacks

Post by Aspca4ever on Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:12 pm

'knee-jerk' hysteria reaction from the news media; often the people providing the taped footage just don't PROOF READ their sources and will plaster anything & everything up for our viewing pleasure --- confused
Feeding the populace seems to be just a 'throw them a bone' --- it matters not where the body was from or how they obtained that same said bone! silent
avatar
Aspca4ever

Posts : 42
Join date : 2016-03-18
Location : lost in the land of OZ-KANSAS that is

Back to top Go down

Re: Media treatment of terrorist attacks

Post by oftenwrong on Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:38 pm

"Stock" photos are what keeps journalism from being just acres of newsprint, or TV being a succession of talking heads.  A picture does not need to be a precise reproduction of an actual situation to serve as "illustration".
When it comes to television news however, it is very apparent that coverage will often be limited to whatever pictures may be available.  No pictures - no story.  
In the case in point, the Brussels outrages were captured in detail on smart-phone cameras wielded by some survivors, and it's reasonable to ask why those "fortunate ones" were wasting their time taking pictures instead of assisting the wounded.  But the historical record may be more important, especially for anti-terrorism authorities.
avatar
oftenwrong
Sage

Posts : 11754
Join date : 2011-10-08

Back to top Go down

Re: Media treatment of terrorist attacks

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum